1. Is Nagel's scientific explanation argument an anti-physicalist argument? Can you think of a reply to this argument?
2. Sometimes there are two "modes of presentation" for a single fact. Still, there are problems with using the mode/fact distinction in replying to the knowledge argument. What are some of these?
3. Is it possible for one to know 'what it's like' to taste stinky tofu even if one has never actually tasted stinky tofu?