Main.COGN10012007aIntro2 History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to output

August 30, 2007, at 09:43 PM by 219.77.138.143 -
Changed lines 43-44 from:
brain-lot.jpg
to:
media:brain-lot.jpg
August 30, 2007, at 09:43 PM by 219.77.138.143 -
Changed lines 43-44 from:
media:theta-network.png
to:
brain-lot.jpg
August 30, 2007, at 09:42 PM by 219.77.138.143 -
Added lines 51-52:
media:neurons.jpg
August 30, 2007, at 09:41 PM by 219.77.138.143 -
Changed lines 41-42 from:
Example:
to:
Examples:

media:theta-network.png

August 30, 2007, at 12:08 PM by 219.77.138.143 -
Added lines 52-53:
[-An incomplete connection diagram of the visual areas:-]
August 30, 2007, at 12:07 PM by 219.77.138.143 -
Changed lines 52-53 from:
%width=250px height=250px% media:visual-connections.gif
to:
%width=300px height=300px% [[media:visual-connections.gif|media:visual-connections.gif]]
August 30, 2007, at 12:06 PM by 219.77.138.143 -
Changed lines 52-53 from:
%width=50px height=50px% media:visual-connections.gif
to:
%width=250px height=250px% media:visual-connections.gif
August 30, 2007, at 12:06 PM by 219.77.138.143 -
Changed lines 52-53 from:
%width=50px% or %height=50px% media:visual-connections.gif
to:
%width=50px height=50px% media:visual-connections.gif
August 30, 2007, at 12:06 PM by 219.77.138.143 -
Changed lines 52-53 from:
media:visual-connections.gif
to:
%width=50px% or %height=50px% media:visual-connections.gif
August 30, 2007, at 12:05 PM by 219.77.138.143 -
Added lines 41-46:
Example:

The sentence ''we shall discuss violence on TV'' is ambiguous.

media:violence-on-tv.jpg

August 29, 2007, at 01:48 AM by 219.78.66.25 -
Changed lines 74-75 from:
* SPECIALIZATION not incompatible with PLASTICITY.
to:
Changed lines 81-82 from:
to:
* As a result most people underestimate the power of scientific explanations of the mind.
August 29, 2007, at 01:44 AM by 219.78.66.25 -
Changed lines 35-37 from:

%apply=img border='1px solid black'%
media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
to:
media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
August 29, 2007, at 01:43 AM by 219.78.66.25 -
Changed lines 35-36 from:
%apply=img border='1px solid black'%media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
to:

%apply=img border='1px solid black'% media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
August 29, 2007, at 01:43 AM by 219.78.66.25 -
Changed lines 35-36 from:
%apply=img border='1px solid black'% media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
to:
%apply=img border='1px solid black'%media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
August 29, 2007, at 01:42 AM by 219.78.66.25 -
Changed lines 35-36 from:
%border=1%media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
to:
%apply=img border='1px solid black'% media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
August 29, 2007, at 01:41 AM by 219.78.66.25 -
Changed lines 35-36 from:
%img-border=1%media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
to:
%border=1%media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
August 29, 2007, at 01:39 AM by 219.78.66.25 -
Changed lines 35-36 from:
%img-border%media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
to:
%img-border=1%media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
August 29, 2007, at 01:39 AM by 219.78.66.25 -
Changed lines 37-43 from:
* A program is a set of rules for manipulating symbols, e.g.

@@@
FOR F=1 TO 10\\
PRINT
F\\
NEXT
F@@@

to:
* A program is a set of rules for manipulating symbols, e.g. FOR F=1 TO 10; PRINT F; NEXT F
August 29, 2007, at 01:38 AM by 219.78.66.25 -
Changed lines 35-36 from:
media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
to:
%img-border%media:ice-cream-recipe.gif
Changed lines 39-43 from:
@@FOR F=1 TO 10
PRINT F
NEXT F@@

to:
@@@FOR F=1 TO 10\\
PRINT F\\
NEXT F@@@

August 29, 2007, at 01:36 AM by 219.78.66.25 -
Added lines 35-43:
media:ice-cream-recipe.gif

* A program is a set of rules for manipulating symbols, e.g.

@@FOR F=1 TO 10
PRINT F
NEXT F@@

August 29, 2007, at 01:25 AM by 219.78.66.25 -
Added lines 65-68:
** Broca's area is related to language production.
** Area MT is related to perception of visual motion.
** FFA is related to face perception.
** The amygdala is related to emotions.
August 28, 2007, at 11:29 PM by 219.77.143.162 -
Added lines 75-78:
Demo

* Biological motion perception: http://www.psypress.com/mather/resources/swf/Demo11_7.swf
* Attribution of social causality: doi:10.1177/1362361300004002004
August 28, 2007, at 10:42 PM by 219.77.143.162 -
Added lines 44-45:
motion detection system: http://www.physpharm.fmd.uwo.ca/undergrad/sensesweb/L4Motion/L4Motion.swf
August 28, 2007, at 07:31 PM by 219.77.143.162 -
Changed lines 23-24 from:
Information processing in the mind
to:
The distinctive feature of practically all mental processes is that they involve complex information processing.
Changed lines 31-32 from:
The distinctive feature of a lot of mental processes is that they involve complex information processing. But complex information processing is best explained by computations and representations. So we have reasons to believe that mental processes should be explained by computations in the brain. There are mental representations that encode information, and there are mental processes that operate on such representations.
to:
But complex information processing is best explained by computations and representations.

* What is [[http://www
.google.com/search?q=23+x+54|23 x 54]]

Conclusion: We
have reasons to believe that mental processes should be explained by computations in the brain. There are mental representations that encode information, and there are mental processes that operate on such representations.
August 28, 2007, at 07:21 PM by 219.77.143.162 -
Changed lines 12-13 from:
** Damage to the front of the brain can our personality
** Damage to the back of the brain can cause blindness
to:
** Damage to the (frontal lobe of the) brain can change our personality
** Damage to the back (e.g. the primary visual cortex) of the brain can cause blindness
August 28, 2007, at 07:16 PM by 219.77.143.162 -
Deleted line 7:
Changed lines 10-11 from:
* We have no a priori reason to think that substance dualism must be wrong. Only experiments can help us decide which approach is better. What is true is that the physicalist approach has been more successful in improving our understanding of the mind.
to:
* We have no ''a priori'' reason to think that substance dualism must be wrong. Only observations and experiments can help us decide which approach is more likely to be true. The fact that we WANT theory X to be true / we HOPE that theory X is true does not make theory X true.
* So far it seems that the physicalist approach has been more successful in improving our understanding of the mind. How would a dualist explain:
** Damage to the front of the brain can our personality
** Damage to the back of the brain can cause blindness
** Alcohol can affect our balance and consciousness
** Some thoughts correspond to specific patterns of activities in the brain:

August 26, 2007, at 11:07 PM by 219.77.143.31 -
Changed lines 38-39 from:
!!2. Cogsci is interdisciplinary
to:
!!4. Cogsci is interdisciplinary
Changed lines 52-53 from:
!!3. The mind is modular
to:
!!5. The mind is modular
Changed lines 58-59 from:
!!5. Most mental processes are unconscious
to:
!!6. Most mental processes are unconscious
August 26, 2007, at 11:06 PM by 219.77.143.31 -
Changed lines 34-35 from:
media:visual-connections.jpg
to:
media:visual-connections.gif
August 26, 2007, at 11:05 PM by 219.77.143.31 -
Changed lines 34-35 from:
to:
media:visual-connections.jpg
August 26, 2007, at 10:57 PM by 219.77.143.31 -
Changed line 54 from:
* Cognitive science is more like reverse engineering - understanding a complex system by identifying the functions of different parts and see how they interact.
to:
* Cognitive science is more like reverse engineering - understanding a complex system by identifying the functions of different parts and see how they interact. [[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/Piano_action_-_Project_Gutenberg_eText_17571.jpg/548px-Piano_action_-_Project_Gutenberg_eText_17571.jpg|piano]]
August 26, 2007, at 10:51 PM by 219.77.143.31 -
Changed lines 14-17 from:
\\
Here we study subjects who freely decided which of two tasks to perform and covertly held onto an intention during a variable delay. Only after this delay did they perform the chosen task and indicate which task they had prepared. We demonstrate that during the delay, it is possible to decode from activity in medial and lateral regions of prefrontal cortex which of two tasks the subjects were covertly intending to perform.
@@@
to:
 \\
Here we study subjects who freely decided which of two tasks to perform and covertly held onto an intention during a variable delay. Only after this delay did they perform the chosen task and indicate which task they had prepared. We demonstrate that during the delay, it is possible to decode from activity in medial and lateral regions of prefrontal cortex which of two tasks the subjects were covertly intending to perform.@@@
August 26, 2007, at 10:50 PM by 219.77.143.31 -
Changed lines 13-17 from:
to:
@@@Example: Haynes, J-D. and Sakai, K. and Rees, G. and Gilbert, S. and Frith, C. and Passingham, R.E. (2006) Reading hidden intentions in the human brain. Current Biology, 17 (4). pp. 323-328. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.11.072\\
\\
Here we study subjects who freely decided which of two tasks to perform and covertly held onto an intention during a variable delay. Only after this delay did they perform the chosen task and indicate which task they had prepared. We demonstrate that during the delay, it is possible to decode from activity in medial and lateral regions of prefrontal cortex which of two tasks the subjects were covertly intending to perform.
@@@

August 03, 2007, at 09:36 PM by 219.78.179.5 -
Changed lines 4-5 from:
* Summary: All mental processes are to be explained by parallel neural computations in the brain.
to:
* Summary: '''All mental processes are to be explained by parallel neural computations in the brain'''.
August 03, 2007, at 09:36 PM by 219.78.179.5 -
Changed lines 3-25 from:
!Readings

* [Required] http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-science/
* Thagard, Paul (1996). ''[[http://library
.hku.hk/search/t?SEARCH=Mind%20%3A%20Introduction%20to%20Cognitive%20Science|Mind : Introduction to Cognitive Science]]'' Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. [accessible from netlibrary.com]

!What is cognitive science?

!!Definition: Cognitive science is the science of mind and behavior
.

!!Feature #1: Cognitive science studies mind and behavior.

* All sorts of [[mental states]] (beliefs, emotions),
processes (reasoning, speech), phenomena (consciousness), and behavior (motion, facial expressions, speech).
* Both normal and abnormal (prosopagnosia, autism) cases, human and animal minds are studied.

!!Feature #2: Cognitive science is a science.

* Empirical testability: Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations. They should be [[thinkweb:sci/hd.php|supported by strong evidence]]. [Questions to ask: Can theory X explain data Y? Are the predictions of theory X correct? Are there other theories that provide better explanations and predictions than theory X?]
* Varieties of experimental approaches: brain scans, psychophysics experiments, studies of cognitive deficits, reaction time, computer simulation, ...

!Themes in explanation

!!1. Cogsci is materialist

to:
* Cognitive science is the science of mind and behavior. What is special about this discipline? How does it compare to neurophysiology / psychology?
* Summary: All mental processes are to be explained by parallel neural computations in the brain
.

!1. The BRAIN explains ALL mental processes

Changed lines 13-14 from:
!!2. Cogsci is interdisciplinary
to:

!2. COMPUTATION is the key to the explanations

Information processing in the mind

* Perception - acquiring real-time information about the surrounding environment.
* Language use - making use of information about syntax, semantics and phonology.
* Reasoning - combining different sources of information, deriving new information, testing consistency of information, etc.
* Action - making use of information in action planning and guidance.
* Memory - storing and retrieving information

The distinctive feature of a lot of mental processes is that they involve complex information processing. But complex information processing is best explained by computations and representations. So we have reasons to believe that mental processes should be explained by computations in the brain. There are mental representations that encode information, and there are mental processes that operate on such representations.

!3. PARALLEL NEURAL computation

Added lines 31-35:

!Other features of cognitive science

!!2. Cogsci is interdisciplinary

Deleted lines 53-64:
!!4. Mental processes are explained in terms of parallel computations in the brain

Information processing in the mind

* Perception - acquiring real-time information about the surrounding environment.
* Language use - making use of information about syntax, semantics and phonology.
* Reasoning - combining different sources of information, deriving new information, testing consistency of information, etc.
* Action - making use of information in action planning and guidance.
* Memory - storing and retrieving information

The distinctive feature of a lot of mental processes is that they involve complex information processing. But complex information processing is best explained by computations and representations. So we have reasons to believe that mental processes should be explained by computations in the brain. There are mental representations that encode information, and there are mental processes that operate on such representations.

August 03, 2007, at 09:27 PM by 219.78.179.5 -
Added lines 1-71:
!Methodology of cognitive science

!Readings

* [Required] http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-science/
* Thagard, Paul (1996). ''[[http://library.hku.hk/search/t?SEARCH=Mind%20%3A%20Introduction%20to%20Cognitive%20Science|Mind : Introduction to Cognitive Science]]'' Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. [accessible from netlibrary.com]

!What is cognitive science?

!!Definition: Cognitive science is the science of mind and behavior.

!!Feature #1: Cognitive science studies mind and behavior.

* All sorts of [[mental states]] (beliefs, emotions), processes (reasoning, speech), phenomena (consciousness), and behavior (motion, facial expressions, speech).
* Both normal and abnormal (prosopagnosia, autism) cases, human and animal minds are studied.

!!Feature #2: Cognitive science is a science.

* Empirical testability: Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations. They should be [[thinkweb:sci/hd.php|supported by strong evidence]]. [Questions to ask: Can theory X explain data Y? Are the predictions of theory X correct? Are there other theories that provide better explanations and predictions than theory X?]
* Varieties of experimental approaches: brain scans, psychophysics experiments, studies of cognitive deficits, reaction time, computer simulation, ...

!Themes in explanation

!!1. Cogsci is materialist

* Mental phenomena are explained in terms of physical processes in the brain. Most cognitive scientists are PHYSICALISTS (or MATERIALISTS) - everything in the world is made up of physical substance.
* PHYSICALISTS would deny SUBSTANCE DUALISM - the view that the mind is a soul, some kind of non-extended and non-physical object. Substance dualism is of course a part of most religious doctrines.
* We have no a priori reason to think that substance dualism must be wrong. Only experiments can help us decide which approach is better. What is true is that the physicalist approach has been more successful in improving our understanding of the mind.

!!2. Cogsci is interdisciplinary

The mind is extremely complicated
* Around 100 billion inter-connected neurons

Vertical and horizontal division of labour is needed to understand the mind.
* Horizontal division of labour: Mental phenomena involves language, perception, reasoning, emotions, etc. Different scientists focus on different areas.
* Vertical division of labour: Each mental phenomena can be investigated at [[Main.Levels of Description|various levels]] - the task level, the level of algorithm, and the level of neural mechanism.

Some of the disciplines of cogsci:

* Psychology - cognitive psychology, developmental psychology
* Linguistics - syntax, semantics, phonology
* Neuroscience - brain structures, localization
* Computer science - AI, computer models
* Philosophy - theoretical foundations

!!3. The mind is modular

* The brain is a complex system with different functional parts, e.g. visual areas, language, reasoning, ...
* Cognitive science is more like reverse engineering - understanding a complex system by identifying the functions of different parts and see how they interact.
* SPECIALIZATION not incompatible with PLASTICITY.

!!4. Mental processes are explained in terms of parallel computations in the brain

Information processing in the mind

* Perception - acquiring real-time information about the surrounding environment.
* Language use - making use of information about syntax, semantics and phonology.
* Reasoning - combining different sources of information, deriving new information, testing consistency of information, etc.
* Action - making use of information in action planning and guidance.
* Memory - storing and retrieving information

The distinctive feature of a lot of mental processes is that they involve complex information processing. But complex information processing is best explained by computations and representations. So we have reasons to believe that mental processes should be explained by computations in the brain. There are mental representations that encode information, and there are mental processes that operate on such representations.

!!5. Most mental processes are unconscious

We are not consciously aware of much of our mental processes.

* We have lots of different beliefs at any given time, but we are not aware of all of them at the same time.
* We are not aware of how we retrieve information from memory, how we recognize faces, ...