Main.GodOmnipotence History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to output

August 29, 2008, at 08:58 PM by 219.78.21.219 -
Changed line 7 from:
* [Required] Anthony Kenny (1987) The definition of omnipotence. In Thomas Morris (ed.) (1987) The concept of God. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
to:
* [Required] Anthony Kenny (1987) The definition of omnipotence. In Thomas Morris (ed.) (1987) The concept of God. Oxford : Oxford University Press. intranet:kenny-omnipotence.pdf
August 29, 2008, at 01:59 PM by 147.8.27.166 -
Added line 7:
* [Required] Anthony Kenny (1987) The definition of omnipotence. In Thomas Morris (ed.) (1987) The concept of God. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
August 23, 2008, at 10:41 PM by 219.78.21.219 -
Changed line 7 from:
* http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/omnipotence/
to:
* [Required] http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/omnipotence/
August 23, 2008, at 10:40 PM by 219.78.21.219 -
Added lines 45-53:
Rene Descartes

media:descartes.jpg

@@@I do not think that we should ever say of anything that it cannot be brought about by God.@@@

* D: God made the laws of logic and can change them.
* God can bring about logical impossibilities.

August 23, 2008, at 10:29 PM by 219.78.21.219 -
Changed lines 14-18 from:
to:
* On the other hand:
** Augustine: God cannot die or be deceived
** Anselm: God cannot be corrupted
** Aquinas: God cannot move, fail ...

Deleted lines 73-77:
Augustine: God cannot die or be deceived

Anselm: God cannot be corrupted

Aquinas: God cannot move, fail ...
August 23, 2008, at 10:28 PM by 219.78.21.219 -
Added lines 3-4:
media:god.jpg
Changed lines 8-9 from:
to:
* http://www.courses.rochester.edu/wierenga/REL111/omnipch.html
Added lines 69-74:

Augustine: God cannot die or be deceived

Anselm: God cannot be corrupted

Aquinas: God cannot move, fail ...
August 23, 2008, at 10:21 PM by 219.78.21.219 -
Changed lines 52-53 from:
The [=McEar=] example
to:
Anthony Kenny:

@@@[An omnipotent being has] ... every power which it is logically possible to possess.@@@

But see the
[=McEar=] example
August 18, 2008, at 10:19 PM by 219.78.21.219 -
Added lines 34-42:
!!The "beyond logic" response

"The argument relies on man-made logic. God is more powerful than logic. God is beyond logic. So this argument cannot show that God does not exist."

Comments:

# The short response - nothing is "beyond" logic. Logic is not conventional.
# The longer response - if logic is given up, we cannot reason about God at all and we would not know what to believe about God.

August 18, 2008, at 10:15 PM by 219.78.21.219 -
Changed lines 1-2 from:
!Readings
to:
!God and omnipotence

!
!Readings
Changed lines 7-8 from:
!The problem
to:
!!Quotes

* Job 42:2 I know that you can do all things; no plan of yours can be thwarted.
* Matthew 19:26 Jesus looked at them and said, "With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible."

!
!The problem
Changed lines 18-19 from:
!Some initial remarks
to:
!!Some initial remarks
Changed lines 28-29 from:
!How should "omnipotence" be defined?
to:
Compare:

# Can God create a stone so heavy that God cannot lift?
# Can God create a round triangle?
# Can God create a stone so heavy that the creator of the stone cannot lift?

!
!How should "omnipotence" be defined?
Changed lines 45-46 from:
!Misc issues
to:
!!Misc issues
August 04, 2008, at 10:38 PM by 219.78.90.110 -
Added lines 30-31:
The [=McEar=] example
August 04, 2008, at 10:36 PM by 219.78.90.110 -
Changed line 7 from:
# (a) Suppose God can create a stone that he cannot lift. Then (b)  there is a stone that God cannot lift. So God cannot be omnipotent.
to:
# (a) Suppose God can create a stone that he cannot lift. Then (b)  there is a stone that God cannot lift. So (c) God cannot be omnipotent.
August 04, 2008, at 10:35 PM by 219.78.90.110 -
Added line 16:
* Unless it is necessary that God is omnipotent, God can still be the most powerful agent rather than an omnipotent one.
Added lines 20-37:

!How should "omnipotence" be defined?

X is omnipotent =

# For any logically possible state of affairs S, X is able to bring about S.
# If it is logically possible for any agent to perform action A, then X is able to perform A.
# X is able to do whatever X wants to do.
# X is able to do whatever that is logically possible for X to do.

!Misc issues

Do you think God (if there is one) is able to:

# destroy himself
# change the past
# do something evil
# create another God
August 04, 2008, at 10:28 PM by 219.78.90.110 -
Added lines 10-18:

!Some initial remarks

* God could be "she" or "it".
* The argument is not directed specifically at the Christian God. Any version of theism that postulates an omnipotent God would have to deal with this problem.
* There is no reason why the problem has to be formulated in terms of creating a stone. A similar question is whether God can create a creature that He cannot control.
* It is sometimes said that even if God cannot create such a stone, we cannot conclude that God is not omnipotent.
** The purported justification is that to create such a stone is to do something logically impossible, and not being able to do something logically impossible does not imply not being omnipotent.
** However, this response is not quite correct. It is true that if God cannot create a round square, we should not conclude that God is not omnipotent. But creating a stone that the creator of the stone cannot lift is not logically impossible.
August 04, 2008, at 10:26 PM by 219.78.90.110 -
Changed lines 5-9 from:
!How to define omnipotence?
to:
!The problem

# (a) Suppose God can create a stone that he cannot lift. Then (b)  there is a stone that God cannot lift. So God cannot be omnipotent.
# (a) Suppose God cannot create such a stone. Then (b) there is something that God cannot do. So again (c) God is not omnipotent.
# Given 1 and 2, it follows that either (a) God does not exist, or (b) if God exists, then God is not omnipotent.
July 31, 2008, at 11:46 PM by 219.79.244.143 -
Added lines 1-5:
!Readings

* http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/omnipotence/

!How to define omnipotence?