Main.NeuralNetworkComputability History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup

December 27, 2006, at 06:56 PM by 219.78.91.233 -
Changed lines 6-7 from:
to:
  • Note: choice of activation functions.
December 27, 2006, at 06:55 PM by 219.78.91.233 -
Changed lines 7-8 from:

Neural network computable → Turing computable?

to:

Question#1: Neural network computable → Turing computable?

Changed lines 11-12 from:

Turing computable → neural network computable?

to:

Question#2: Turing computable → neural network computable?

December 27, 2006, at 06:55 PM by 219.78.91.233 -
Changed lines 11-12 from:

Neural networks can compute Turing computable functions

to:

Turing computable → neural network computable?

Added line 14:
Added line 16:
Added line 18:
Changed lines 21-22 from:

Comment

to:

Comments

December 27, 2006, at 06:54 PM by 219.78.91.233 -
Added lines 1-23:

Computability considerations regarding neural nets

In mathematics and logic, computable functions = Turing computable functions

Neural network computable → Turing computable?

  • Presumably Turing machines can simulate any neural network to arbitrary finite precision given enough memory.

Neural networks can compute Turing computable functions

  • Siegelmann and Sontag (1991). Turing Computability With Neural Nets. Applied Mathematics Letters.

@This paper shows the existence of a finite neural network, made up of sigmoidal neurons, which simulates a universal Turing machine. It is composed of less than 105 synchronously evolving processors, interconnected linearly. High-order connections are not required.@

  • J. Pedro Neto, Hava T. Siegelmann, J. Félix Costa, C.P. Suarez Araujo. (1997). Turing Universality of Neural Nets (Revisited). Lecture Notes in Computer Science – 1333, 361-366. Springer-Verlag.

@We show how to use recursive function theory to prove Turing universality of finite analog recurrent neural nets, with a piecewise linear sigmoid function as activation function.@

Comment

  • Such mathematical results do not show that if X is computational equivalent to Y, then X is just as efficient and practical to implement as Y.
  • The systems can differ at the level of algorithm and at the level of hardware implementation.

Mind