Focus on this argument:
Are you justified in accepting the conclusion? Note that:
David Hume (1711-1776)
@When on innumerable occasions we observe certain experiences succeeding others, we naturally feel under similar circumstances in the future like events or causes will be followed by like effects... only custom or habit may validly be said to serve as the foundation for this causal idea.
@
Kant "Introduction" Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics
@I openly confess, the suggestion of David Hume was the very thing, which many years ago first interrupted my dogmatic slumber, and gave my investigations in the field of speculative philosophy quite a new direction
@
Hume Treatise, Book I, Part IV, Section VII, p. 269 in the Selby-Bigge edition
Note: Hume does not argue that we should give up induction. He thinks we are psychologically incapable of giving up induction.
@Most fortunately it happens that, since reason is incapable of dispelling these clouds, nature herself suffices to that purpose, and cures me of this philosophical melancholy and delirium, either by relaxing this bent of mind, or by some avocation and lively impression of my senses which obliterate all these chimeras. I dine, I play a game of back-gammon, I converse and I am merry with my friends; and when after three or four hours' amusement, I would return to these speculations, they appear so cold and strain'd, and ridiculous, that I cannot find in my heart to enter into them any further.
@