Main.WhatIsCognitiveScience History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to output

Changed lines 5-7 from:
* Thagard, Paul (1996) [[http://library.hku.hk/search/t?SEARCH=Mind%20%3A%20Introduction%20to%20Cognitive%20Science|Mind : Introduction to Cognitive Science]] Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press. [accessible from netlibrary.com]
* Howard Gardner (1985) [[http://library.hku.hk/search/g153+G22/g153+g22/-2%2C-1%2C0%2CB/frameset&FF=g153+g22&1%2C1%2C|The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution]]
to:
* Thagard, Paul (1996). ''[[http://library.hku.hk/search/t?SEARCH=Mind%20%3A%20Introduction%20to%20Cognitive%20Science|Mind : Introduction to Cognitive Science]]'' Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. [accessible from netlibrary.com]
* Howard Gardner (1985). ''[[http://library.hku.hk/search/g153+G22/g153+g22/-2%2C-1%2C0%2CB/frameset&FF=g153+g22&1%2C1%2C|The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution]]''
Changed lines 12-13 from:
See the readings about the history of cognitive science.
to:
See the readings about the history of cognitive science. VERY briefly, cognitive science is the product of developments in computer science and AI, neuroscience, and a reaction against behaviorism in psychology, linguistics and philosophy.
Changed lines 10-11 from:
Definition: Cognitive science is the science of mind and behavior.
to:
!!Definition: Cognitive science is the science of mind and behavior.

See the readings about the history of cognitive science
.
Changed lines 25-30 from:
Mental phenomena are explained in terms of physical processes in the brain. Most cognitive scientists are PHYSICALISTS or MATERIALISTS - everything in the world is made up of physical substance.

PHYSICALISTS would deny SUBSTANCE DUALISM - the view that the mind is a soul, some kind of non-extended and non-physical object. Substance dualism is of course a part of most religious doctrines.

We have no a priori reason to think that substance dualism must be wrong. Only experiments can help us decide which approach is better. What is true is that the physicalist approach has been more successful in improving our understanding of the mind.
to:

*
Mental phenomena are explained in terms of physical processes in the brain. Most cognitive scientists are PHYSICALISTS (or MATERIALISTS) - everything in the world is made up of physical substance.
* PHYSICALISTS would deny SUBSTANCE DUALISM - the view that the mind is a soul, some kind of non-extended and non-physical object. Substance dualism is of course a part of most religious doctrines.
* We have no a priori reason to think that substance dualism must be wrong. Only experiments can help us decide which approach is better. What is true is that the physicalist approach has been more successful in improving our understanding of the mind.
Changed lines 32-36 from:
* The mind is extremely complicated - around 100 billion inter-connected neurons
* Vertical and horizontal division of labour is needed to understand the mind.

Horizontal division of labour: Mental phenomena involves language, perception, reasoning, emotions, etc. Different scientists focus on different areas. Vertical division of labour: Each mental phenomena can be investigated at various levels - the task level, the level of algorithm, and the level of neural mechanism.
to:
The mind is extremely complicated
* Around 100 billion inter-connected neurons

Vertical and horizontal division of labour is needed to understand the mind.
* Horizontal division of labour: Mental phenomena involves language, perception, reasoning, emotions, etc. Different scientists focus on different areas.
*
Vertical division of labour: Each mental phenomena can be investigated at [[Main.Levels of Description|various levels]] - the task level, the level of algorithm, and the level of neural mechanism.
Changed lines 15-16 from:
* Both normal and abnormal (prosopagnosia, autism) cases are studied.
to:
* Both normal and abnormal (prosopagnosia, autism) cases, human and [[Main.AnimalCognition|animal minds]] are studied.
Changed lines 21-22 from:
* Dominant methodology in cogsci: interdisciplinary approach, explains the mind in terms of parallel, interacting computational systems of neurons.
to:
Changed lines 24-39 from:
!!1. Cogsci is interdisciplinary
The mind is extremely complicated - around 20 billion inter-connected neurons

Vertical and horizontal division of labour is needed to understand the mind.

Horizontal division of labour: Mental phenomena involves language, perception, reasoning, emotions, etc. Different scientists focus on different areas. Vertical division of labour: Each mental phenomena can be investigated at various levels - the task level, the level of algorithm, and the level of neural mechanism.

Some of the disciplines of cogsci:

* Psychology - cognitive psychology, developmental psychology
* Linguistics - syntax, semantics, phonology
* Neuroscience - brain structures, localization
* Computer science - AI, computer models
* Philosophy - theoretical foundations

!!2
. Cogsci is materialist
to:
!!1. Cogsci is materialist
Added lines 31-45:
!!2. Cogsci is interdisciplinary

* The mind is extremely complicated - around 100 billion inter-connected neurons
* Vertical and horizontal division of labour is needed to understand the mind.

Horizontal division of labour: Mental phenomena involves language, perception, reasoning, emotions, etc. Different scientists focus on different areas. Vertical division of labour: Each mental phenomena can be investigated at various levels - the task level, the level of algorithm, and the level of neural mechanism.

Some of the disciplines of cogsci:

* Psychology - cognitive psychology, developmental psychology
* Linguistics - syntax, semantics, phonology
* Neuroscience - brain structures, localization
* Computer science - AI, computer models
* Philosophy - theoretical foundations

Changed lines 49-50 from:
* SPECIALIZATION not incompatible with PLASTICITY
to:
* Cognitive science is more like reverse engineering - understanding a complex system by identifying the functions of different parts and see how they interact.
* SPECIALIZATION not incompatible with PLASTICITY.

Added line 53:
Deleted lines 70-76:
!What is the difference between cognitive science and psychology?

Brief answer

* Cognitive science is more like reverse engineering the mind to discover its architecture.
* So less emphasis on social aspects and applications.

Changed lines 6-7 from:
* Howard Gardner [[http://library.hku.hk/search/g153+G22/g153+g22/-2%2C-1%2C0%2CB/frameset&FF=g153+g22&1%2C1%2C|The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution]]
to:
* Howard Gardner (1985) [[http://library.hku.hk/search/g153+G22/g153+g22/-2%2C-1%2C0%2CB/frameset&FF=g153+g22&1%2C1%2C|The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution]]
Changed line 5 from:
* Thagard, Paul (1996) Mind : Introduction to Cognitive Science Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press. [accessible from netlibrary.com]
to:
* Thagard, Paul (1996) [[http://library.hku.hk/search/t?SEARCH=Mind%20%3A%20Introduction%20to%20Cognitive%20Science|Mind : Introduction to Cognitive Science]] Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press. [accessible from netlibrary.com]
Changed line 19 from:
* Empirical testability: Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations. They should be [[thinkweb:sci/hd.php|supported by strong evidence]].
to:
* Empirical testability: Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations. They should be [[thinkweb:sci/hd.php|supported by strong evidence]]. [Questions to ask: Can theory X explain data Y? Are the predictions of theory X correct? Are there other theories that provide better explanations and predictions than theory X?]
Changed line 19 from:
* Empirical testability: Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations. They should be [thinkweb:sci/hd.php|supported by strong evidence].
to:
* Empirical testability: Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations. They should be [[thinkweb:sci/hd.php|supported by strong evidence]].
Changed line 19 from:
* Empirical testability: Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations. They should be [think:sci/hd.php|supported by strong evidence].
to:
* Empirical testability: Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations. They should be [thinkweb:sci/hd.php|supported by strong evidence].
Changed lines 10-16 from:
!!Definition: Cognitive science is the science of mind and behavior.

* What Cognitive Science is not: mind reading.

!!Feature #1: Cognitive science studies mind and behavior

* All sorts of [[mental states]]
(belief, emotions), processes (reasoning, speech), phenomena (consciousness), and behavior (motion)
to:
Definition: Cognitive science is the science of mind and behavior.

!!Feature #1: Cognitive science studies mind and behavior.

* All sorts of [[mental states]] (beliefs, emotions), processes (reasoning, speech), phenomena (consciousness), and behavior (motion, facial expressions, speech).
Changed lines 17-19 from:
!!Feature #2: Cognitive science is a science

* Empirical testability: Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations but have to be tested by experiments and observations.
to:
!!Feature #2: Cognitive science is a science.

* Empirical testability: Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations. They should be [think:sci/hd.php|supported by strong evidence].
Changed line 4 from:
* [Required] A brief intro from Berkeley cogsci programme at http://ls.berkeley.edu/ugis/cogsci/major/about.php
to:
* [Required] A brief intro from Berkeley's cognitive science programme at http://ls.berkeley.edu/ugis/cogsci/major/about.php
Changed lines 6-7 from:
* Howard Gardner [[http://library.hku.hk/search/g153+G22/g153+g22/-2,-1,,B/browse|The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution]]
to:
* Howard Gardner [[http://library.hku.hk/search/g153+G22/g153+g22/-2%2C-1%2C0%2CB/frameset&FF=g153+g22&1%2C1%2C|The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution]]
Changed lines 6-7 from:
* Howard Gardner The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution
to:
* Howard Gardner [[http://library.hku.hk/search/g153+G22/g153+g22/-2,-1,,B/browse|The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution]]
July 28, 2005, at 03:54 PM by 147.8.22.251 -
Changed line 16 from:
* All sorts of mental states (belief, emotions), processes (reasoning, speech), phenomena (consciousness), and behavior (motion)
to:
* All sorts of [[mental states]] (belief, emotions), processes (reasoning, speech), phenomena (consciousness), and behavior (motion)
Changed lines 25-27 from:
!More details about methodology

1. Cogsci is interdisciplinary
to:
!Themes in explanation

!!
1. Cogsci is interdisciplinary
Changed line 42 from:
2. Cogsci is materialist
to:
!!2. Cogsci is materialist
Changed lines 49-50 from:
3. The mind is modular
to:
!!3. The mind is modular
Changed line 54 from:
4. Mental processes are explained in terms of parallel computations in the brain
to:
!!4. Mental processes are explained in terms of parallel computations in the brain
Changed lines 65-66 from:
5. Most mental processes are unconscious
to:
!!5. Most mental processes are unconscious
July 28, 2005, at 03:53 PM by 147.8.22.251 -
Changed lines 10-13 from:
Definition: Cognitive science is the science of mind and behavior. What does this imply?

Feature
#1: Cognitive science studies mind and behavior
to:
!!Definition: Cognitive science is the science of mind and behavior.

*
What Cognitive Science is not: mind reading.

!!
Feature #1: Cognitive science studies mind and behavior
Changed lines 19-22 from:
Feature #2: Cognitive science is a science

* Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations but have to be tested by experiments and observations.
* Types of experiments: brain scans, psychophysics experiments, studies of cognitive deficits, reaction time, computer simulation, ...
to:
!!Feature #2: Cognitive science is a science

* Empirical testability: Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations but have to be tested by experiments and observations.
* Varieties of experimental approaches: brain scans, psychophysics experiments, studies of cognitive deficits, reaction time, computer simulation, ...
July 26, 2005, at 10:52 AM by 219.78.20.18 -
Deleted lines 0-1:
[[Category.Mind]]
Changed lines 75-77 from:
* So less emphasis on social aspects and applications.
to:
* So less emphasis on social aspects and applications.

[[Category.Mind]]
July 26, 2005, at 10:47 AM by 219.78.20.18 -
Added lines 1-2:
[[Category.Mind]]
July 25, 2005, at 10:10 PM by 219.77.144.13 -
Changed line 4 from:
* [Required] A brief intro from Berkeley cogsci programme
to:
* [Required] A brief intro from Berkeley cogsci programme at http://ls.berkeley.edu/ugis/cogsci/major/about.php
July 25, 2005, at 10:09 PM by 219.77.144.13 -
Changed lines 70-71 from:
!!What is the difference between cognitive science and psychology?
to:
!What is the difference between cognitive science and psychology?
July 25, 2005, at 10:09 PM by 219.77.144.13 -
Changed lines 23-24 from:
More on methodology
to:
!More details about methodology
Added line 46:
Added line 62:
Added line 64:
Changed lines 70-71 from:
FAQ - What is the difference between cognitive science and psychology?
to:
!!What is the difference between cognitive science and psychology?
July 25, 2005, at 10:07 PM by 219.77.144.13 -
Changed lines 8-9 from:
What is cognitive science?
to:
!What is cognitive science?
Added line 11:
Changed lines 14-16 from:
    * All sorts of mental states (belief, emotions), processes (reasoning, speech), phenomena (consciousness), and behavior (motion)
   
* Both normal and abnormal (prosopagnosia, autism) cases are studied.
to:
* All sorts of mental states (belief, emotions), processes (reasoning, speech), phenomena (consciousness), and behavior (motion)
* Both normal and abnormal (prosopagnosia, autism) cases are studied.
Changed lines 19-22 from:
    * Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations but have to be tested by experiments and observations.
    * Types of experiments: brain scans
, psychophysics experiments, studies of cognitive deficits, reaction time, computer simulation, ...
   
* Dominant methodology in cogsci: interdisciplinary approach, explains the mind in terms of parallel, interacting computational systems of neurons.
to:
* Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations but have to be tested by experiments and observations.
* Types of
experiments: brain scans, psychophysics experiments, studies of cognitive deficits, reaction time, computer simulation, ...
*
Dominant methodology in cogsci: interdisciplinary approach, explains the mind in terms of parallel, interacting computational systems of neurons.
Added line 24:
Changed lines 34-39 from:
    * Psychology - cognitive psychology, developmental psychology
    * Linguistics
- syntax, semantics, phonology
 
  * Neuroscience - brain structures, localization
    * Computer science - AI, computer models
   
* Philosophy - theoretical foundations
to:
* Psychology - cognitive psychology, developmental psychology
* Linguistics - syntax, semantics, phonology
* Neuroscience
- brain structures, localization
* Computer science - AI, computer models
*
Philosophy - theoretical foundations
Changed lines 48-50 from:
    * The brain is a complex system with different functional parts, e.g. visual areas, language, reasoning, ...
   * SPECIALIZATION not incompatible with PLASTICITY
to:
* The brain is a complex system with different functional parts, e.g. visual areas, language, reasoning, ...
* SPECIALIZATION not incompatible with PLASTICITY
Changed lines 54-59 from:
    * Perception - acquiring real-time information about the surrounding environment.
    * Language use - making use of information about syntax, semantics and phonology.
    * Reasoning - combining different sources of
information, deriving new information, testing consistency of information, etc.
   * Action - making use of information in action planning and guidance.
   
* Memory - storing and retrieving information
to:
* Perception - acquiring real-time information about the surrounding environment.
* Language use - making use of information about syntax, semantics and phonology.
* Reasoning - combining different sources of information, deriving new information, testing consistency of information, etc.
* Action - making use of
information in action planning and guidance.
* Memory - storing and retrieving information
Changed lines 64-66 from:
    * We have lots of different beliefs at any given time, but we are not aware of all of them at the same time.
   * We are not aware of how we retrieve information from memory, how we recognize faces, ...
to:
* We have lots of different beliefs at any given time, but we are not aware of all of them at the same time.
* We are not aware of how we retrieve information from memory, how we recognize faces, ...
Changed lines 70-71 from:
    * Cognitive science is more like reverse engineering the mind to discover its architecture.
   * So less emphasis on social aspects and applications.
to:
* Cognitive science is more like reverse engineering the mind to discover its architecture.
* So less emphasis on social aspects and applications.
July 25, 2005, at 10:06 PM by 219.77.144.13 -
Changed lines 3-7 from:
- [Required] http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-science/
    * [Required] A brief intro from Berkeley cogsci programme
    * Thagard, Paul (1996) Mind : Introduction to Cognitive Science Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press. [accessible from netlibrary.com]
   
* Howard Gardner The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution
to:
* [Required] http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-science/
* [Required] A brief intro from Berkeley cogsci programme
* Thagard, Paul (1996) Mind : Introduction to Cognitive Science Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press. [accessible from netlibrary
.com]
*
Howard Gardner The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution
July 25, 2005, at 10:06 PM by 219.77.144.13 -
Changed lines 1-3 from:
Readings

   * [Required] http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-science/
to:
!Readings

- [Required] http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-science/
July 25, 2005, at 10:03 PM by 219.77.144.13 -
Added lines 1-68:
Readings

    * [Required] http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-science/
    * [Required] A brief intro from Berkeley cogsci programme
    * Thagard, Paul (1996) Mind : Introduction to Cognitive Science Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press. [accessible from netlibrary.com]
    * Howard Gardner The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution

What is cognitive science?
Definition: Cognitive science is the science of mind and behavior. What does this imply?
Feature #1: Cognitive science studies mind and behavior

    * All sorts of mental states (belief, emotions), processes (reasoning, speech), phenomena (consciousness), and behavior (motion)
    * Both normal and abnormal (prosopagnosia, autism) cases are studied.

Feature #2: Cognitive science is a science

    * Theories and hypotheses in cogsci are not armchair speculations but have to be tested by experiments and observations.
    * Types of experiments: brain scans, psychophysics experiments, studies of cognitive deficits, reaction time, computer simulation, ...
    * Dominant methodology in cogsci: interdisciplinary approach, explains the mind in terms of parallel, interacting computational systems of neurons.

More on methodology
1. Cogsci is interdisciplinary
The mind is extremely complicated - around 20 billion inter-connected neurons

Vertical and horizontal division of labour is needed to understand the mind.

Horizontal division of labour: Mental phenomena involves language, perception, reasoning, emotions, etc. Different scientists focus on different areas. Vertical division of labour: Each mental phenomena can be investigated at various levels - the task level, the level of algorithm, and the level of neural mechanism.

Some of the disciplines of cogsci:

    * Psychology - cognitive psychology, developmental psychology
    * Linguistics - syntax, semantics, phonology
    * Neuroscience - brain structures, localization
    * Computer science - AI, computer models
    * Philosophy - theoretical foundations

2. Cogsci is materialist
Mental phenomena are explained in terms of physical processes in the brain. Most cognitive scientists are PHYSICALISTS or MATERIALISTS - everything in the world is made up of physical substance.

PHYSICALISTS would deny SUBSTANCE DUALISM - the view that the mind is a soul, some kind of non-extended and non-physical object. Substance dualism is of course a part of most religious doctrines.

We have no a priori reason to think that substance dualism must be wrong. Only experiments can help us decide which approach is better. What is true is that the physicalist approach has been more successful in improving our understanding of the mind.
3. The mind is modular

    * The brain is a complex system with different functional parts, e.g. visual areas, language, reasoning, ...
    * SPECIALIZATION not incompatible with PLASTICITY

4. Mental processes are explained in terms of parallel computations in the brain
Information processing in the mind

    * Perception - acquiring real-time information about the surrounding environment.
    * Language use - making use of information about syntax, semantics and phonology.
    * Reasoning - combining different sources of information, deriving new information, testing consistency of information, etc.
    * Action - making use of information in action planning and guidance.
    * Memory - storing and retrieving information

The distinctive feature of a lot of mental processes is that they involve complex information processing. But complex information processing is best explained by computations and representations. So we have reasons to believe that mental processes should be explained by computations in the brain. There are mental representations that encode information, and there are mental processes that operate on such representations.
5. Most mental processes are unconscious
We are not consciously aware of much of our mental processes.

    * We have lots of different beliefs at any given time, but we are not aware of all of them at the same time.
    * We are not aware of how we retrieve information from memory, how we recognize faces, ...

FAQ - What is the difference between cognitive science and psychology?
Brief answer

    * Cognitive science is more like reverse engineering the mind to discover its architecture.
    * So less emphasis on social aspects and applications.