** Module: Basic logic**

- L00. Introduction
- L01. What is logic?
- L02. Statements
- L03. Logical connectives
- L04. Logical relations

** Quote of the page**

I must be allowed to add some explanatory remarks to bring the subject home to reason—to that sluggish reason, which supinely takes opinions on trust, and obstinately supports them to spare itself the labour of thinking.

- Mary Wollstonecraft

Help us promote

critical thinking!

** Popular pages**

- What is critical thinking?
- What is logic?
- Hardest logic puzzle ever
- Free miniguide
- What is an argument?
- Knights and knaves puzzles
- Logic puzzles
- What is a good argument?
- Improving critical thinking
- Analogical arguments

Here are a few basic concepts in logic that you ought to be familar with, whether you are studying symbolic logic or not.

The *negation* of a statement α is a statement whose truth-value is necessarily opposite to that of α. So for example, for any English sentence α, you can form its negation by appending "it is not the case that" to α to form the longer statement **"it is not the case that α"**.

In formal logic, the negation of α can be written as "not-α", "~α" or "¬α".

Here are some concrete examples:

Statement (α) | Negation (¬α) |

It is raining | It is not the case that it is raining (i.e. It is not raining.) |

1+1=2 | It is not the case that 1+1=2 (i.e. 1+1 is not 2.) |

Spiderman loves Mary | It is not the case that Spiderman loves Mary. |

There are two points about negation which should be obvious to you:

- A statement and its negation can never be true together. They are logically inconsistent with each other.
- A statement and its negation exhaust all logical possibilities - in any situation, one and only one of them must be true.

- What is the negation of "God exists"?
- Is "I must not leave" the negation of "I must leave"?
- Is "Tom is very happy" the negation of "Tom is very depressed"?

A disjunction is a kind of complex sentence typically expressed in English by the word "or", such as:

Either we meet tonight, or we do not meet at all.

The sentence has the structure of "either P or Q", where P and Q are statements

In logic, we often make a distinction between *exclusive disjunction* and *inclusive disjunction*.

According to the exclusive interpretation, "P or Q" is true when P is true, or when Q is true, false when P and Q are both true, and also false when P and Q are false. Many people take the exclusive interpretation to be what is intended in for example "You can have tea or you can have coffee", where it is supposed to be implied that you can only have one or the other but not both.

On the inclusive interpretation, "P or Q" is false when P and Q are both false, and it is true in all other situations, including when both P and Q are true.