Errors and typos in the 2011 print edition of the book:
- Page 5 1.3.2, second paragraph line 3 - "a sawed off golf club" rather than "a sawed off a golf club".
- Page 13, 2.1 last paragraph line 3 - "pay attention" rather than "paying attention".
- Page 30 - 3.6 (a) "simplify" rather than "simply".
- Page 36, 4.5, first paragraph line 5 – “different senses” rather than “different sense”.
- Page 44 last but one paragraph - "depends on" rather than "depends".
- Page 48 first full paragraph line 3 – “it can usually be” rather than “it can be usually be”.
- Page 61 third full paragraph line 2 - “it was it was an egg” should be “it was an egg”.
- Page 71 - In the second argument example, "premise" and "conclusion" are the wrong way round. Should be "The first sentence is the conclusion and the second sentence is the premise."
- Page 78 - In the middle of the page, "Putu" should be "Sunarsih", "Chaak" should be "Ching".
- Page 84, line 6 - "we should try out best". Should be "our".
- Page 84, line 7 - "anyone who disagree"
- Page 91, line 3 - "inductively strength". Should be "inductive".
- Page 98, 99 - There are grey patches on the argument map diagrams. The grey patch next to "correct" should actually be a tick symbol, and the one next to "wrong" should be a cross symbol.
- Page 100 - There are two horizontal lines in the argument map diagram above "ok" and "correct". Both should be the tick symbol.
- Page 187 first paragrah of section 20.2 "judgment is made" rather than "judgment in made".
- Page 210 last but one paragraph - "rationalization become" rather than "rationalization becomes".
- Page 188 - "South Dakota" should be "North Dakota" in the second bullet point.
- Page 203 - There are two grey patches in the SWOT analysis diagram. The left one should be a "thumbs up" picture. The right one should be a "thumbs down" symbol.
- Page 218 third line from the bottom - "to work on". missing "to".
- Page 241, 11.1.d - Should be "If x is heavier than y and z cannot lift y, then z cannot lift x."
Thanks to Daniel Hill, Jackey Cheung, and Wai-hung Wong for identifying some of these errors.