[C04] Teaching critical thinking
Module: Critical thinking
- C00. Introduction
- C01. What is critical thinking?
- C02. Improve our thinking skills
- C03. Defining critical thinking
- C04. Teaching critical thinking
- C05. Beyond critical thinking
- C06. The Cognitive Reflection Test
- C07. Critical thinking assessment
- C08. Videos and courses on critical thinking
- C09. Famous quotes
- C10. History of critical thinking
Quote of the page
The most essential characteristic of scientific technique is that it proceeds from experiment, not from tradition.
- Bertrand Russell
Help us promote
critical thinking!
Popular pages
- What is critical thinking?
- What is logic?
- Hardest logic puzzle ever
- Free miniguide
- What is an argument?
- Knights and knaves puzzles
- Logic puzzles
- What is a good argument?
- Improving critical thinking
- Analogical arguments
In a survey conducted by the UCLA Higher Education Research Institute, 99.6% of university teachers agreed that critical thinking is an "very important" or "essential" goal for undergraduate education. (HERI (2009) The American College Teacher: National Norms for 2007–2008. Higher Education Research Institute, University of California.)
But how should critical thinking be taught? There are lots of different issues to be investigated, such as:
- Should critical thinking be taught as a separate subject on its own, or should it be taught in combination with other specific subjects that the students are studying?
- Which are the topics that are most crucial? How useful are lessons in formal logic or Venn diagrams? How should we go about designing a curriculum?
Research from education psychology and cognitive science are very much relevant when designing an effective pedagogy for teaching critical thinking. Here is a research article on this topic commissioned by our website:
Tim van Gelder (2004) "Teaching Critical thinking: Lessons from cognitive science"
A later version is published as van Gelder, T. J. (2005). Teaching critical thinking: some lessons from cognitive science. College Teaching, 53, 41-6.
Abstract: This article draws six key lessons from cognitive science for teachers of critical thinking. The lessons are: acquiring expertise in critical thinking is hard; practice in critical thinking skills themselves enhances skills; the transfer of skills must be practiced; some theoretical knowledge is required; diagramming arguments ("argument mapping") promotes skill; and students are prone to belief preservation. The article provides some guidelines for teaching practice in light of these lessons.
Some researchers have suggested that studying argument mapping is a good way to improve critical thinking, and sometimes more effective than traditional lectures. You can find some of the research articles from google scholars here: https://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?q=argument+mapping+critical+thinking.
Also, see our next tutoral on the importance of metacognition.
If you are interested in issues related to critical thinking in higher education, the following volume might be useful:
Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett (2015) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education Palgrave.
